Roger Deakins

Posted on by

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 106 through 120 (of 553 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Exposing film for Bleach Bypass #217972
    Roger Deakins
    Keymaster

      I know that underexposing is generally suggested but I have not ever followed that rule. I suspect that is because, when I use bleach bypass, I usually want that stretched highlight and/or deeper shadow. Otherwise, why use it?

      in reply to: Matching 2 shots in different locations #217971
      Roger Deakins
      Keymaster

        Are you overthinking this. Plenty of times I have shot on location and made a scene out of two different locations. There is one in Hail Caesar! And I’m not telling you which one. An interior, with no problem with sunlight, should be quite straightforward. Same lens, same camera height, same soft side light and you are set.

        in reply to: Creating natural-looking window light after sunset #217970
        Roger Deakins
        Keymaster

          The question is: Do you need to see what is outside the windows? It is a far more difficult job to create a dusk effect on location during the day, especially if the sun is out, and still see a view outside a window.

          in reply to: Lighting for Confined Spaces #217870
          Roger Deakins
          Keymaster

            I remember using more than the practical lights, which I had chosen and had been built into the set, but I can’t remember what. Probably a simple bounced Tweenie.

            in reply to: Composition and Symmetry #217506
            Roger Deakins
            Keymaster

              I really don’t consciously think about ‘composition’ when I am composing. Not in any theoretical way, that is. Of course, you think about the lens you have on and whether the shot would be wider and closer or further away on a slightly longer lens. You lean your body to the right or left when your intuition tells you there may be something better from a slightly different angle, but its not like I am analyzing why I am doing that. I lean my body and use my eyes.

              in reply to: 360 degree swing body cam rig #217504
              Roger Deakins
              Keymaster

                Personally, I don’t see why you would use a rig like that rather than a Steadicam. There is some very distracting movement in the shot.

                in reply to: Thoughts on HDR remasters #217426
                Roger Deakins
                Keymaster

                  I am usually informed when a film is going to be remastered. Is it a good thing? Most definitely. Some of the original scans are very poor quality, besides which, there is nowadays a greater technical ability to match the image to the original intent.

                  in reply to: 10 year passages visual approach #217422
                  Roger Deakins
                  Keymaster

                    I was being tongue in cheek about the calendar.

                    You could easily do a time lapse of the door. Fade out the night lighting to black and the time laps dawn rising on the door. Pretty simple and certainly cheap.

                     

                    in reply to: Johnny Coquillon and minimal lighting #217421
                    Roger Deakins
                    Keymaster

                      I was a great admirer of Pat Garret and Billy the Kid. I didn’t ever meet Coquillion as I was only just entering film school when Straw Dogs was being filmed. I remember all the gossip from that set as it was in the daily papers. Straw Dogs, for me, is Peckinpah’s worst film. That and Cross of Iron. I did get to know Dan Melnick quite well by the time I had shot two of his films.

                      in reply to: Revolutionary Road: Window Shot #217420
                      Roger Deakins
                      Keymaster

                        Ah! That’s a question. I never did use a cherrypicker to fake the sunlight on Rev Road so this must have been the real thing.

                        in reply to: Deciding width of OTS shot? #217343
                        Roger Deakins
                        Keymaster

                          Well, the choice is obviously motivated by the context but also is an instinctive choice on the day.

                          in reply to: Short film cinematography #217342
                          Roger Deakins
                          Keymaster

                            Edward Munch.

                            in reply to: 10 year passages visual approach #217341
                            Roger Deakins
                            Keymaster

                              Time lapse would be cost effective. You could do a stop motion shot of dust covering a table or an object of some sort decaying. There is always the pages of a calendar flying by!

                              Roger Deakins
                              Keymaster

                                I would choose a window treatment, curtains or blinds, that let me silhouette a figure against them. Also, if a curtain, and it can be bunched up, I have even more control over what is seen. That is the same technique as I used for a night scene in ‘Empire of Light’. Otherwise, for you, its just a TV, which is fine but will not inform an audience as to the time of day.

                                in reply to: 1917, burning church scene cinematography #217339
                                Roger Deakins
                                Keymaster

                                  That question would require pages and pages to answer. Perhaps you could look into previous posts and in the ‘look at lighting’ pages on this site.

                                Viewing 15 replies - 106 through 120 (of 553 total)