Mike

Posted on by

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 85 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Directing effect of 1:33 (4:3) ratio #215710
    Mike
    Participant

      Can’t edit on this forum so can’t remove second photo but the ratio is roughly correct.

      Interesting subject though.

      in reply to: Directing effect of 1:33 (4:3) ratio #215709
      Mike
      Participant

        Sorry wrong photo downloaded.

        in reply to: Directing effect of 1:33 (4:3) ratio #215708
        Mike
        Participant

          If you are using the same lens then the 4.3 image should look like the photo attached would it not?

          in reply to: Directing effect of 1:33 (4:3) ratio #215684
          Mike
          Participant

            Roger,

            Didnt you use 4.3 on your earlier films such as ‘White Mischief’ etc.

            I particularly like the format especially where there’s a lot of dialogue, you do not need to be distracted by lots of background etc. only my view of course. Interesting subject.

            in reply to: Lighting advice on reducing high key light source #215524
            Mike
            Participant

              You have not said what type of lights you have.  You could change the light bulbs, you can even buy coloured ones these days but to start you off try using defusers and large reflectors. Perhaps gold reflectors to soften the light. You need to do a lot experimentation to get it right but you will be pleased with the results. Also try using LED flashlights with coloured filters to make it look interesting. There are many things you can do but you must experiment first. Wish you luck.

              in reply to: Semi-transparent curtain in front of greenscreen #215463
              Mike
              Participant

                Large paper backdrops.

                in reply to: Semi-transparent curtain in front of greenscreen #215462
                Mike
                Participant

                  If you are on a tight budget then I suggest you borrow a relatives house perhaps one with view and base your production there obviously at an agreed fee. Btw, there are hundreds of backdrops available from China from $15.00 upwards, hundreds of subjects to choose from. Example attached

                  in reply to: Semi-transparent curtain in front of greenscreen #215457
                  Mike
                  Participant

                    Claypaki lit stage.

                    in reply to: Semi-transparent curtain in front of greenscreen #215456
                    Mike
                    Participant

                      I worked for BBC Drama that’s studio and location work. It was common practice to project an image behind windows etc, otherwise a backdrop was either made or hired to suit the stage. Nowadays large printers can produce any backdrop, provide a plate or photo and they will print out for you, any size no problem. Try making your own backdrop and experiment with your lighting person to light to taste.

                      in reply to: Semi-transparent curtain in front of greenscreen #215443
                      Mike
                      Participant

                        Should read will not see the joins. You scan use a TV for backdrops depends on the size of the window of course but you have not said what you are trying to achieve

                        in reply to: Semi-transparent curtain in front of greenscreen #215442
                        Mike
                        Participant

                          you can hire backdrops quite cheaply or you can print out backdrops yourself in sections and pasting them on a board, you will see the joins. Net curtains are also cheap assume you want the curtains to be split in the middle to reveal a background. You can also project a backdrop using a digital projector so not sure why this scene difficult to achieve. There’s are many ways you can go, it is very cheap to achieve .

                          in reply to: Derek Parfit #215398
                          Mike
                          Participant

                            Running short of time so cannot dwell on this subject but it is down to personal taste really, I do like his photos but cannot understand why he has to manipulate his photos, it is not just tweaking them, he distorts them to his liking, he is never happy with the results, I have been to Venice and St Petersburg and you cannot fail to take a good photograph, why he changes the whole meaning is a mystery!  Van Gogh made thousands of paintings and only sold one is also a mystery, he was never satisfied with his work either. Interesting though.

                            in reply to: Derek Parfit #215395
                            Mike
                            Participant

                              Not a great photographer imo but he certainly took a lot of photos, he spent most of his time manipulating them in his photoshop. I know he used Nikon F’s and a Linhof 5×4 on many of his early works perhaps he switched to digital later. Interesting photos all the same but if you shoot thousands of fools of film, you will eventually find a good one! 🧐

                              in reply to: Derek Parfit #215394
                              Mike
                              Participant

                                Not a great photographer imo but he certainly took a lot of photos, he spent most of his time manipulating them in his photoshop. I know he used Nikon F’s and a Linhof 5×4 on many of his early works perhaps he switched to digital later. Interesting photos all the same but if you shoot thousands of fools of film, you will eventually find a good one! 🧐

                                in reply to: In camera lens corrections #215377
                                Mike
                                Participant

                                  Worth noting,

                                  A set of ‘Preloved’ Zeiss Super speeds will cost you £75.00 (That’s 5 lenses).

                                  Arri Alexa camera well used will cost you between £5,000-£8,000 bare unit. Used by numorous crews and environments. No spares back up for the early models. Shelf life for an Alexa is 15-20 years (If you’ve lucky).

                                  Lenses have a shelf life of 100 years. Makes you think, put your money in glass!

                                Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 85 total)