Forum Replies Created
-
Replies
-
Yes the advantage of a physical filter is that you see their effect while shooting and may adjust lights ect accordingly. It might also be more fun 🙂
I didn’t want to talk you out of trying things the way you want to!
Using post-diffusion does not mean that you make the decision in post. Usually you do tests before shooting and decide on what you are going for then.
But of course you can use physical filters if that is what you want.
I personally would advise against physical filters. You cannot undo the effect. Luckily, filter diffusion is the one thing that actually makes sense to do in post imo. There is a plugin that emulates all popular diffusion and haze filters called Scatter from Video Village. It’s visually indistinguishable and you have infinitely more control than with physical filters. I think they have a demo version you can try.
I’m not Roger, but I just can’t hold back on this topic; in my opinion HDR does more harm than good aesthetically, especially on films. There certainly are people that enjoy it but I think the demand for HDR was created by the industry first, not the audience, just like with 4K or 3D TV’s.
Look at a 9 light or 12 light Maxi Brute. If you hold your hand close the lamp you see every shadow, though perhaps you should do this with an equivalent multiple bulb LED if you value your hand.
:))
Not David but in my opinion one example would be a “gritty” story.
I’m preparing a dark mystery-thriller and intend to use grain, the soundtrack uses lots of grainy, gritty, granular sound elements as well.
I think the balance is delicate and I prefer the grain to be “felt” rather than seen.
Personally I think the “Dune” pipeline was a bit of a gimmick. I’d guess general audience hardly got anything from it (if at all) that couldn’t have been achieved much simpler and cheaper.
I’m always interested in the effort/benefit ratio and for me personally this didn’t pass it. Then again, that was a very big production, with top notch people, and they get to levels of quality where I’d imagine such details matter more.
from the top of my head:
The Wrestler
Black Swan
Children of Men
Chungking Express
Pusher
District 9
NOTE:
I am currently using a VPN because I could not login anymore after testing to edit the above post, which failed.This often happened to me, not being able to login anymore after there was an error posting or editing.
Clearing cache, using different browsers ect does not work, even a VPN only occasionally did the trick.
I assume the “ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS” is caused by the website and unfortunately seems to still be there.
I often would not be able to post a second time in a thread. First time always worked, second time only occasionally.
This is the first test and seems to work so far.
Would love to hear from Roger, too!
Here’s my take as I finished my first feature screenplay after 3 years: dialogue is the hardest part. I realized that I am not good enough at writing dialogue and reduced it to a bare minimum.
‘Show don’t tell’ can be more time consuming when writing and I believe many screenwriters don’t have the time (or muse) to do so – they rather fall back on mediocre dialogue. I see it a lot and it bothers me, too.
I think dialogue is an art in itself and those who master it are few. You mentioned some, from the top of my head I’d add Aaron Sorkin and George R.R. Martin (though technically not a screenwriter).
Just finished watching the new Beverly Hills Cop
I haven’t dared to watch it yet, mostly because Netflix films usually are like clones from each other. They all look the same, sound the same and seem to be based on generic”success” strategies.
There are only very rare exceptions that don’t disappoint me, and I’ll certainly watch the Beverly Hills Cop revival at some point, but this is the typical type of film where Netflix would use colorful images and loud noises to distract from any storytelling shortcomings.
Writing all this, I really don’t know why I still pay them 🙂
