-
Search Results
-
Topic: considering editing
Hi Master Roger Deakins,
for some films cinematographer considers editing in the pre-production.
For example, Mad Max: Fury Road, due to its fast cutting. In every shot the main element is in the center of the composition so the editor can use the eye trace for fast cutting.
In one interview Joe Walker said about the Blade Runner 2049 ” its a very intimate relationship on set with DOP and their director and i don’t come in the middle of that. I kind of know what they’re doing what they’re trying to achieve and they know what i’m trying to achieve.”
sir is it best to know about each others work so everything leads into a place, everyone wished?. or is it best to maintain everybody freedom on their works?
Sir Roger did you considers the editing during prep in any of the films that you worked beside 1917.
thank you.
Hi Roger and all the masters,
I watched a movie that was celebrating its 20th anniversary with a restored 4K version shown in theaters. During the screening, I noticed that the visuals had more depth and finer details compared to the version shown from film copies, which I watched 20 years ago.
Could you explain the theory and chemistry behind this? Is it because the film underwent color correction with digital technology nowadays?
Even if color correction was applied, it wasn’t done on RAW or Log footage, and the available range for adjustments shouldn’t have been extensive.
Additionally, why couldn’t film from the past achieve the same level of colors and depth in film lab as we can achieve today?
Hi master Roger,
Hope you are doing well.
Have you had a chance to see “oppenheimer” yet, if so, can you share us your thoughts on this film.
for me, I’d myself watched it twice at theatre. one on medium quality imax (not laser or 70mm) and one on a normal theatre. yet Planning to watch it one more time before it goes out of theatre.
The film was so powerful for me in terms of it’s storytelling, Imagery, Sound and music.
Though i had read the biography the film is based as an audiobook before the film’s release. It felt like The film achieved something of an impact the book could never.
The most powerful craft on this film imo was the acting and The cinematography which portrayed the actors emotions so psychologically powerful to the audient.The Imagery felt so anew and powerful that I couldn’t take my eyes away at most of the film due to the power of it’s imagery. The tone made me feel like wacthing history itself made like a documentary rather than a cinematic palatte yet so cinematic, possibly because of the power or approach of lighting in this film, I suppose.Cause tenet or interstellar even didn’t felt this much powerful to me as an audient even though the imagery shot with same imax cameras.
Master Roger it would be great to hear your thoughts on this film if watched yet.
Thank you.
Hello, I was looking for lighting critiques for this image I made awhile ago as I want to hone in on methods of lighting such as using controlled ambient lighting with practicals as I did in the image here with this only having top fluorescent tubes through a plastic screen, a lamp to the side, and festive lights in the background. The goal was to create something comforting but ominous and moody at the same time and I had much more grand plans but as per the contest I wanted to submit this in on time I had to go with whatever I could do so there’s that. I’d love to hear your thoughts.