mskb

Posted on by

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Directing effect of 1:33 (4:3) ratio #215815
    mskb
    Participant

      All, I just read a British Cinematographer’s post on the movie Maestro by Matthew Libatique, Bradley Cooper directing, where the 1.33 aspect ratio was used. Here is a relevant excerpt. Thoughts/comments?

      The filmmakers landed on “something simpler” by beginning with black-and-white and a 1.33 aspect ratio before transitioning to colour and remaining in the same aspect ratio for the most part. At the end, for scenes taking place in 1989, and when Felicia becomes sick, the film moves into what Cooper refers to as a “more relatable” 1.85.

      This framing is appropriate, says Libatique, because the 1.33 frame “allows Leonard and Felicia to share the frame and exist in an embrace of their new world together.” Their relationship is set up in this way from when they first meet at a party. “In the next scene, they’re in a tight two shot profile, with the party behind them. It’s a 1.33 frame where half their heads are actually out of the frame,” he adds. “That tight frame exists again when she takes him to the theatre and they kiss. Later, when they fight, again, they’re both in the frame, but it’s much wider. And then towards the end Leonard is by himself in a 1.85 frame with all this negative space on either side.”

      ” – British Cinematographer, April 2024.

      in reply to: Shallow depth of field #215799
      mskb
      Participant

        I agree as well on your Batman and Oppenheimer points @IgorVe. Very interesting thread!

        in reply to: Shaky cams. #215794
        mskb
        Participant

          They do talk about “handheld” and here is a relevant paragraph, and of course, the usual example of Bourne series.

          “Though it’s generally advised that too much handheld can
          induce nausea in some viewers, there are examples of hand-
          held-heavy productions that have been quite successful. Paul
          Greengrass’ The Bourne Ultimatum (AC Sept. ‘07) was shot by
          Oliver Wood with a great deal of handheld — sometimes aggres-
          sively so — and this gives the action thriller a documentary-like
          immediacy. Indeed, the Bourne films are known for this look.”  : – AC, April 2024.

           

          in reply to: Shaky cams. #215793
          mskb
          Participant

            Thank you @ThisGuy321.

            All, this month’s issue of American Cinematographer seems to be talking about camera movements. I am searching if there is anything on Shaky cams. So far no luck. 🙂

            Cheers!

            in reply to: Lighting for mood and evoking an emotion. #215787
            mskb
            Participant

              Thank you very much @Roger Deakins !

              in reply to: Lighting for mood and evoking an emotion. #215775
              mskb
              Participant

                Thanks @LucaM . That helps!

                in reply to: Shaky cams. #215751
                mskb
                Participant

                  @LucaM, I have noticed the clean Fargo push in as well; this was also discussed in a Deakins podcast. These were quite enjoyable indeed.


                  @Stip
                  , I had completely failed to notice that move in Good Will Hunting! Thank you!

                  I am hoping that @dmullenasc can chime in here as well! 🙂

                   

                  in reply to: Shaky cams. #215747
                  mskb
                  Participant

                    Thank you for the insight @Stip. I will check out the Safdie brothers movies.

                    Cheers!

                  Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)