mskb

Posted on by

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 replies - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: We don’t have Chivo? :-) #218637
    mskb
    Participant

      Hello James!

      Wow! That’s so great!

      I have been traveling. Last night, I wanted to relax and listen to the Deakins podcast. Oh my! I was caught by a complete surprise! We have got you, David and Roger, discussing TRUE GRIT! I am not fully done yet, I will post some feedback over this weekend, but easily one of the best episodes I have heard. Very focussed clearly articulated questions from the macro – to the – micro! Exactly what we all wanted!

      Thank you James, Roger and David!
      Kumar

      PS: We will definitely write to Chivo. I will also request the forum members to do the same! 🙂 Chivo may just think it is easier to simply be on the podcast, than go through emails asking him to join us on the Team Deakins podcast!

      mskb
      Participant

        I’d be willing to do it when all three of us are free to talk.

        That is fantastic David! Thank you!
        Team Deakins, this would be great to pull off!

        And … while we are at it, can the forum members also be greedy, and ask that we do this for two enjoyable hours, than say 1? 🙂 🙂  🙂 ( Sorry, couldn’t hide the excitement! )

        Thank you David, once again!

        mskb
        Participant

          Awesome! Let’s have more votes on this please! 🙂

          in reply to: Technical Knowledge for Cinematographers – Oct 30, 2024 #216541
          mskb
          Participant

            @dmullenasc / @Roger Deakins, Happy thanksgiving! I just finished listening to this episode the second time! It keeps on giving! Thank you! Very enthused, I am looking for books/resources that could help me better understand: (a) camera placement & movements, and (b) lighting, both from the perspective of achieving  desired mood & emotion. Would love your insights! Thank you!

            in reply to: Technical Knowledge for Cinematographers – Oct 30, 2024 #216500
            mskb
            Participant

              I really really enjoyed this episode! Can we have more @dmullenasc episodes please? 🙂

              Around 2.14mins, David mentions that critical ingredients in cinematography is made by film making, camera placement and movements, and lighting. Further in to the episode, @Roger Deakins reiterates these points, and mentions the importance of mood/emotion, enhancing/letting go of elements in the frame. It would be fantastic if we could discuss these points in more detail, with a few examples ? In fact, it would also be awesome to do a Turn the tables episode, where David discusses team Deakins’ work from the perspective of these elements?  I wish you could all get together once again! Thank you very much for this great episode!

              in reply to: Directing effect of 1:33 (4:3) ratio #215815
              mskb
              Participant

                All, I just read a British Cinematographer’s post on the movie Maestro by Matthew Libatique, Bradley Cooper directing, where the 1.33 aspect ratio was used. Here is a relevant excerpt. Thoughts/comments?

                The filmmakers landed on “something simpler” by beginning with black-and-white and a 1.33 aspect ratio before transitioning to colour and remaining in the same aspect ratio for the most part. At the end, for scenes taking place in 1989, and when Felicia becomes sick, the film moves into what Cooper refers to as a “more relatable” 1.85.

                This framing is appropriate, says Libatique, because the 1.33 frame “allows Leonard and Felicia to share the frame and exist in an embrace of their new world together.” Their relationship is set up in this way from when they first meet at a party. “In the next scene, they’re in a tight two shot profile, with the party behind them. It’s a 1.33 frame where half their heads are actually out of the frame,” he adds. “That tight frame exists again when she takes him to the theatre and they kiss. Later, when they fight, again, they’re both in the frame, but it’s much wider. And then towards the end Leonard is by himself in a 1.85 frame with all this negative space on either side.”

                ” – British Cinematographer, April 2024.

                in reply to: Shallow depth of field #215799
                mskb
                Participant

                  I agree as well on your Batman and Oppenheimer points @IgorVe. Very interesting thread!

                  in reply to: Shaky cams. #215794
                  mskb
                  Participant

                    They do talk about “handheld” and here is a relevant paragraph, and of course, the usual example of Bourne series.

                    “Though it’s generally advised that too much handheld can
                    induce nausea in some viewers, there are examples of hand-
                    held-heavy productions that have been quite successful. Paul
                    Greengrass’ The Bourne Ultimatum (AC Sept. ‘07) was shot by
                    Oliver Wood with a great deal of handheld — sometimes aggres-
                    sively so — and this gives the action thriller a documentary-like
                    immediacy. Indeed, the Bourne films are known for this look.”  : – AC, April 2024.

                     

                    in reply to: Shaky cams. #215793
                    mskb
                    Participant

                      Thank you @ThisGuy321.

                      All, this month’s issue of American Cinematographer seems to be talking about camera movements. I am searching if there is anything on Shaky cams. So far no luck. 🙂

                      Cheers!

                      in reply to: Lighting for mood and evoking an emotion. #215787
                      mskb
                      Participant

                        Thank you very much @Roger Deakins !

                        in reply to: Lighting for mood and evoking an emotion. #215775
                        mskb
                        Participant

                          Thanks @LucaM . That helps!

                          in reply to: Shaky cams. #215751
                          mskb
                          Participant

                            @LucaM, I have noticed the clean Fargo push in as well; this was also discussed in a Deakins podcast. These were quite enjoyable indeed.


                            @Stip
                            , I had completely failed to notice that move in Good Will Hunting! Thank you!

                            I am hoping that @dmullenasc can chime in here as well! 🙂

                             

                            in reply to: Shaky cams. #215747
                            mskb
                            Participant

                              Thank you for the insight @Stip. I will check out the Safdie brothers movies.

                              Cheers!

                            Viewing 13 replies - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)