Daniel

Posted on by

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: I Wonder How 1917 Would Have Felt If: #221592
    Daniel
    Participant

      Haha, I understand.

      in reply to: Marty Supreme and Long Lenses #221445
      Daniel
      Participant

        Thanks, David. I will keep your comments in mind when I can catch the film a second time.

        in reply to: Reflections Book Arrived #221418
        Daniel
        Participant

          Hi James, I haven’t been back to the forum for a while and I missed your message.

          I enjoy the book. I try to read books at a slower pace these days. I had a habit of racing through them in the past.

          Unfortunately, I cannot recall the dealer I purchased from! I pre-ordered it from an online retailer and I just can’t seem to find the receipt, email, or line in my old statements.

           

           

          in reply to: Reflections Book Arrived #220374
          Daniel
          Participant

            Did you get your copy?

            in reply to: One Battle After Another In 70mm #220351
            Daniel
            Participant

              I wasn’t able to see the film in Dolby Cinema. Instead, I saw it in Laser at AMC. Overall, the massive 70mm projection did ‘look’ better to my eye. Particularly in the darker scenes.

              I felt a little more comfortable watching the brighter scenes on Laser because there was no flickering.

              The last 3/4 of the movie are a better viewing experience on a massive screen, in my opinion.

              in reply to: **NEW** Looking at Lighting #202200
              Daniel
              Participant

                Thanks for the new material 👍🏿.

                in reply to: Using Mist (filters) #201677
                Daniel
                Participant

                  Hopefully, I’m not putting words in his mouth by saying this. I recall a podcast where he explained that he shot an entire film with filtration and regretted it.

                  Also, in the “old” forum, there was a great discussion where David ( @dmullenasc ) and Roger talked about filters. I think it’s safe to say Roger is willing to use filters but highly selective about it.

                  In the “Looking at lighting” section of the site (Members > Looking At Lighting), Roger breaks down scenes from ‘BR 2049’. He mentions filters, what he selected, why, etc.

                  in reply to: Ansel Adams zone system #201541
                  Daniel
                  Participant

                    @dmullenasc

                    Since we’re talking about how still photography concepts compare to filmmaking, is there a rule like the Sunny 16 rule for how powerful a light you need in more common filmmaking scenarios indoors and outdoors?

                    For example, let’s say I’m shooting 35mm stills. If I walk outside on a sunny, cloudless day, I’ll probably want to overexpose by two stops for a backlit portrait. What’s our rule of thumb for the power in watts that I’d need to fill in an actor’s face in that same scenario?

                    We tried shooting some test scenes with a lone actress outdoors at golden hour with an Aputure P60c (60-watt) LED panel. I had no idea how much power we would need because I’d never done it before. We had zero budget, so we tried the most affordable, portable rental option possible. I learned that power was not enough for what we were trying to accomplish.

                    That same P60c was perfect later that night when we tried filming a test scene backlit by street lights and shops but poorly lit from the front.

                    Do you get to a point where you can “intuit” the minimum amount of light power you’d need to handle a given scene? Or do you math it out or test it most of the time?

                  Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)